<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arbitrary End-of-Decade Listblogging #1 : Albums of the 2000s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seblog.co.uk/2009/11/arbitrary-end-of-decade-listblogging-1-albums-of-the-2000s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seblog.co.uk/2009/11/arbitrary-end-of-decade-listblogging-1-albums-of-the-2000s/</link>
	<description>Like &#34;Weblog&#34;, but by someone called Seb</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 03:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rol</title>
		<link>http://www.seblog.co.uk/2009/11/arbitrary-end-of-decade-listblogging-1-albums-of-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-6423</link>
		<dc:creator>Rol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sebpatrick.cpnet.co.uk/?p=131#comment-6423</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting list. Particularly pleased to see Ooberman reach so high! Though I have to disagree about Favourite Worst Nightmare... it&#039;s the album that almost convinced me th&#039;Arctics were on their way out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting list. Particularly pleased to see Ooberman reach so high! Though I have to disagree about Favourite Worst Nightmare&#8230; it&#8217;s the album that almost convinced me th&#8217;Arctics were on their way out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.seblog.co.uk/2009/11/arbitrary-end-of-decade-listblogging-1-albums-of-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-5981</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sebpatrick.cpnet.co.uk/?p=131#comment-5981</guid>
		<description>You should engage more then! I hadn&#039;t listened to it in about a year, so I dug it out last week and had it in my car, and it is truly superb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should engage more then! I hadn&#8217;t listened to it in about a year, so I dug it out last week and had it in my car, and it is truly superb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.seblog.co.uk/2009/11/arbitrary-end-of-decade-listblogging-1-albums-of-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-5960</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sebpatrick.cpnet.co.uk/?p=131#comment-5960</guid>
		<description>Re: In Rainbows, I suppose I just haven&#039;t listened to/engaged with it enough to consider it for a list like this. It&#039;s almost certainly technically BETTER than half the stuff in here, but do I LIKE it more? Not so much.

And James, you may be right, but any crossover in taste we may have is more rooted in the previous decade, clearly. I think if we did &#039;90s lists, they&#039;d be more similar (although still of course far from identical)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: In Rainbows, I suppose I just haven&#8217;t listened to/engaged with it enough to consider it for a list like this. It&#8217;s almost certainly technically BETTER than half the stuff in here, but do I LIKE it more? Not so much.</p>
<p>And James, you may be right, but any crossover in taste we may have is more rooted in the previous decade, clearly. I think if we did &#8217;90s lists, they&#8217;d be more similar (although still of course far from identical)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James H</title>
		<link>http://www.seblog.co.uk/2009/11/arbitrary-end-of-decade-listblogging-1-albums-of-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-5957</link>
		<dc:creator>James H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sebpatrick.cpnet.co.uk/?p=131#comment-5957</guid>
		<description>The lack of In Rainbows is odd. I agree it shouldn&#039;t necessarily be above Kid A, but it&#039;s their best album since then, was there REALLY not space for it in the bottom 25? REALLY? REALLY??!?!

That aside, this list emphasises one things to me: we really don&#039;t listen to much of the same music. Our tastes diverged some time around 2001, apparently. After that there are only about 5 albums I&#039;ve even heard, let alone would put in a top 50. Still, I might have to do my own and test that theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of In Rainbows is odd. I agree it shouldn&#8217;t necessarily be above Kid A, but it&#8217;s their best album since then, was there REALLY not space for it in the bottom 25? REALLY? REALLY??!?!</p>
<p>That aside, this list emphasises one things to me: we really don&#8217;t listen to much of the same music. Our tastes diverged some time around 2001, apparently. After that there are only about 5 albums I&#8217;ve even heard, let alone would put in a top 50. Still, I might have to do my own and test that theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.seblog.co.uk/2009/11/arbitrary-end-of-decade-listblogging-1-albums-of-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-5954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sebpatrick.cpnet.co.uk/?p=131#comment-5954</guid>
		<description>Interesting list, with remarkably few albums that would also appear on my Top 50 of the decade. I must, however, compliment you on your choice of Arctic Monkeys album - most people would go for &#039;Whatever People Say I Am...&#039; but I think FWN is a much more complete listening experience.

No &#039;In Rainbows&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting list, with remarkably few albums that would also appear on my Top 50 of the decade. I must, however, compliment you on your choice of Arctic Monkeys album &#8211; most people would go for &#8216;Whatever People Say I Am&#8230;&#8217; but I think FWN is a much more complete listening experience.</p>
<p>No &#8216;In Rainbows&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

